Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Obstacles to Criminal Entrenchment


# 114639
Obstacles to Criminal Entrenchment
An examination of the obstacles to criminal entrenchment and approaches to dealing with delinquency.
1,149 words (approx. 4.6 pages) | 6 sources | APA | 2008 Canada


Paper Summary:

This paper discusses the three basic approaches that have evolved in an attempt to develop a suitable sentencing structure for deviant youth. The paper focuses on the retributive or punitive perspective that maintains a stance based on just deserts and argues a tough-on-crime agenda as a means of effectively dealing with delinquency. The rehabilitative approach to dealing with delinquency is also examined.

From the Paper:

"The Behaviour Management Through Adventure project (BMTA) is a therapeutic program for court-involved, youth. It has eight facilities, each specializing in various youth needs. For instance, one facility may work with low-level offenders, while another treats youth sex-offenders. BMTA is a tremendous rehabilitative intervention designed to intercept criminal entrenchment. This program started in 1981 in Georgia, it provides therapy to adopt pro-social behaviours through group, individual, family, and peer counselling. It assesses behaviour and establishes appropriate consequences. Recidivism rates for BMTA between 1991 and 2001 demonstrated that 15.53% returned to detention. Gains in participating in the program include improved perceptions of the concept of family, increased socialization skills, and decreased isolative or depressive behaviours (Walsh, & Aubry, 2007)."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Baffour, T. D. (2006). Conferencing interventions among at-risk adolescents. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23(5), p.557.
  • Dick, A. J., Pence, D. J., Jones, R. M., & Geertsen, H. R. (2004). The need for theory in assessing peer courts. The American Behavioural Scientist, 47(11), 1448-1462.
  • Jones, D. R. (2008). Fixing the juvenile justice system. New York Amsterdam News, (99)9, p.5.
  • Nagin, D. S., Piquero, A. R., Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, E. (2006). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Criminology & Public Policy. 5(4), p.627.
  • Siegel, L. J., Welsh, B. C., & Senna, J. J. (2003). Juvenile Delinquency: Theory, Practice And Law. Thomson,Wadsworth.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Obstacles to Criminal Entrenchment (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 14, 2012, from http://www.academon.ca/Research-Paper-Obstacles-to-Criminal-Entrenchment/114639

MLA Citation:

"Obstacles to Criminal Entrenchment" 15 January 2012. Web. 14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.ca/Research-Paper-Obstacles-to-Criminal-Entrenchment/114639>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: Can.$ 23.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

davis CA
Publisher Since:
Jun 16, 2009
PhD in Business Administration with a specialization in criminal justice from Northcentral University in Arizona. Masters Degree in Criminal Justice from University of Phoenix, and Bachelors Degree in Criminology from Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, BC
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success